Regarding item 12 of the meeting, shareholders refused to approve the the dismissal of the president and secretary of the board of directors, as well as the appointment of their prospective replacements. 63.96% voted against whilst 27.71% were in favour and 8.3% abstained. Following this, in item 13, the removal of the members of the board of directors was also rejected. In this case, the vote count - which was individual for each member of the Board - resulted in a negative vote of between 62% and 64%. Since the removal of the Board members was refused, the 14th item on the agenda, regarding the appointment of new members of the Board of Directors, was called off.
In item 15, an overwhelming majority -96.6% of votes-, approved the issuance of instructions to the Board of Directors and approval of the authorisation of the General Shareholders' Meeting, in relation to the items explicitly listed in Article 160. f) of the Capital Companies Act or in Article 18 bis of the Articles of Association, in which the Board of Directors must submit to the authorisation of the General Shareholders' Meeting, any agreement that entails substantial reform, the demolition for renovation or the permanent transfer of the Ramón Sánchez Pizjuán Stadium, an essential asset of the Entity in accordance with Article 18 bis of the Articles of Association, as well as the construction of a new Stadium in which Sevilla Fútbol Club, S.A.D. will enact its principal corporate activity which constitutes the primary purpose of the Company, in accordance with Article 4 of the aforementioned Articles of Association, which is the practice of the sport of football, participating in official professional sports competitions, both at a national and international level.
Finally, item 16 - regarding the issuance of instructions to the Board of Directors, as well as verifying the legal defence and procedural representation - was discussed. The motion was not passed. In addition, the establishment of the appropriate legal strategies of Sevilla Fútbol Club, S.A.D. in any legal proceedings that affect the composition of its administrative body, was also denied. The granting and revocation of general powers of attorney for lawsuits was also voted upon, with the result 68.84% negative.